Thursday, July 22, 2010

Lack of information on claim denial

CO 16, CO 207 N265, N286
Missing / incomplete / invalid ordering provider
primary identifier.


Item 17A and 17B
17a - If using the UPIN number this must be proceeded by the qualifier 1G then enter the CMSissued
UPIN of the physician listed in item 17
17b - Enter the NPI of the physician as soon as it is available.
Note: The UPIN can be reported until May 22, 2008.

CO 16 MA130
Claim service lacks information which is needed for adjudication. Your claim contains incomplete
and/or invalid information, and no appeal rights are afforded because the claim is unprocessable.

Item 11 - If other insurance is primary to
Medicare, enter the insured’s policy or group
number. If no insurance primary to Medicare
exists, enter “NONE.” If Medicare is primary Item
11 must state the word none, N/A or a blank are
not acceptable.

Non covered service denial - PR 96 and CO 50

PR 96 N115  Non-covered charge(s).

This decision was based on a Local Coverage Determination (LCD). The LCD provides a guide
to assist in determining whether a particular item or service is covered. A copy of this policy is
available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd, or if you do not have web access, you may contact the
contractor to request a copy of the LCD.

CO 50 These are non-covered services because this is not deemed a ‘medical necessity’ by the payer.

This decision was based on Local Coverage Determination (LCD). An LCD provides a guide to assist in determining whether a particular item or service is covered. A copy of this policy is available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd, or if you do not have web access, you may contact the contractor to request a copy of the LCD.


Billing for non-covered services Guideline from BCBS

In the event that BCBSTX determines in advance that a proposed service is not a covered service, a physician or other professional provider may inform the member/subscriber in writing in advance of the service rendered. The member/subscriber must acknowledge this disclosure in writing and agree to accept the stated service as a non-covered service billable directly to the member/subscriber.

To clarify, if you contact BCBSTX and find out that a proposed service is not a covered service, you have the responsibility to pass this along to your patient (our member/subscriber). This disclosure protects both you and the member/subscriber. The member/subscriber is responsible for payment to you of the non-covered service if the member/subscriber elects to receive the service and has acknowledged the disclosure in writing.

Reminder — Contracted providers must file claims

As a reminder, providers must file claims for any covered services rendered to a member, spouse or covered dependent enrolled in a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) health plan. You may collect the full amounts of any deductible, coinsurance or copayment due, and then file the claim with BCBSTX. Arrangements to offer cash discounts to an enrollee in lieu of filing claims with BCBSTX violate the requirements of your provider contract with BCBSTX.

How to prevent the denial

Denial Explanation

Claim/service denied because Medicare cannot pay for the diagnosis/diagnoses on the claim. Denied based on a LCD. Provider liable.

How to Prevent These Denials

These are automated denials. LCDs include a list of covered diagnoses. The diagnosis codes on the claim are compared to the procedure code billed to determine if the services are covered by the LCD. When submitting a claim for payment, code all applicable diagnoses on the claim. Include the final diagnosis as well as
signs and symptoms.

Denial Explanation

Claim/service denied per the NCD module because the diagnosis/diagnoses on the claim did not support the medical necessity for the service. Provider liable


These are automated denials. The laboratory NCDs include a list of covered diagnoses. The  diagnosis codes on the claim are compared to the procedure code billed to determine if the services
are covered by the NCD. When submitting a claim for payment, code all applicable diagnoses on the claim. Include the final diagnosis as well as signs and symptoms.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Action for ins denial - Require medical records or Denied for Medical Necessity

Denial Reason :
Require medical records or Denied for Medical Necessity

Action :

In the first opinion of the carrier, they may feel that the procedure may not be necessary for the diagnosis specified. Hence the request for medical records. We should pull out the medical records from the charge file, take copies of it, attach it along with the claim with a covering letter and send it. Analysis should be done to resubmit all claims with the given procedure-diagnosis combination for the insurance carrier with medical records.



Related Links :

Ins denial and action for PR -35 Lifetime benefit maximum has been reached.

Denial Code :

PR -35 Lifetime benefit maximum has been reached.

Reason :
Benefits exhausted

Action: 

When you get a denial with the above reason then check the system to see if the patient has any secondary insurance, if there is no sufficient information provided in the system then go back to the original file in which the patient’s insurance information was received and if there is a secondary insurance, the claim can be submitted to the secondary insurance, if it does then refile claims to that Insurance.


Related Links :

Denial and action for N14 : Payment based on a contractual amount or agreement, fee schedule, or maximum allowable amount.

Denial Code
N14 : Payment based on a contractual amount or agreement, fee schedule, or maximum allowable amount.

Reason : 

MAXIMUM BENEFITS PAID BY PRIMARY INSURANCE
   
Action : 

When you receive the above denial from secondary insurance need to bill patient except, when the secondary insurance is Medicaid, PHP, Staywell, Health ease, St.Augstine, if Medicaid HMO then its an adjustment.


Related Links :

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Insurance denial and action for-PI 100- Payment made to patient/insured/responsible party

PI 100    Payment made to patient/insured/responsible party.

Reason : AMOUNT PAID TO THE SUBSCRIBER

Action :     This rejection indicates that the claim has been paid to the patient/subscriber. Normally, the claim is paid to the patient if our providers are non-participating with the carrier (BCBS, HMO’s and some commercials). If you find that amount has been paid to the patient, highlight the issue so that action is taken to make providers participating.  In such cases the patient has to be billed.


Related Links :

Monday, July 12, 2010

Denial reason as no documentation

Reasons for No Documentation Errors

No documentation issues are defined in the following six categories:

1. Beneficiary Issue - This category included situations in which:
The provider indicated that no such patient exists, or
The provider indicated that although this patient exists, no such service was provided to the patient.

2. Wrong Date of Service (DOS) - For this category, the provider indicated that they did not have a medical record for the date of service in the CERT request, but they do have a medical record for the same service just a few days before or after the service in question. The claim in question may be a duplicate claim.

3. Medical Record Issue - This category includes instances where the provider responded to a CERT documentation request but did not provide a medical record to support payment of a claim. This category includes the following situations:
The provider indicated that another department within the provider organization is responsible for fulfilling documentation requests,
The provider indicated they have the medical record but refused to provide it without payment for copying/mailing charges,
The provider indicated that it is a HIPAA violation to supply the record,
The provider submitted a statement that the record was destroyed as a result of extenuating circumstances (e.g., fire, flood, explosion),
The provider indicated in writing that they did not provide a service to the beneficiary on the date indicated on the claim, and
The provider indicated they have the medical record but refuse to provide it for some
other reason.

4. Billing Provider Issue - This category contains the following reasons for no documentation:
The provider number has been deactivated,
The provider has gone out of business, or
The provider commented, but failed to produce a record.

5. Third Party Record - This category contains situations in which the provider indicated that a different provider, a third party, has the relevant medical record.

6. Did Not Respond - No response to any CERT documentation request.


CMS attributed no documentation to multiple factors, including the providers’ lack of familiarity with the CERT Review Contractor, concerns about compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and cases where documentation did not exist. In some instances, all of the documentation may be located at a third party. If providers fail to contact the third party or the third party fails to submit the documentation, CMS counted the claim as a no documentation error.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Key Functions of Denial Management

  • Maximize cash flow - Reporting identifies denial causes having the greatest financial impact, thereby accelerating cash flow.
  • Identify the root cause of denials - Collecting and interpreting denial patterns to quantify denial causes and their financial impact.
  • Support accurate workflow priorities and scheduling for follow up - Collecting information on denial appeals, including status, escalation, correspondence with payers, and the disposition of denial appeals to increase recovery amounts.
  • Provide accurate and timely statistics for Management / Clients - Providing management analysis reports and other information to prevent future denials.
  • Track, Prioritize & Appeal denials - Generating appeal letters based on federal and state statutes and case citations favoring the medical provider's appeal.
  • Avoid out-of-timely filing.
  • Analyze the effectiveness of denial resolutions.
  • Identify business process improvements to avoid future denials

Task Management versus Denial Management

Accounts Receivable Management: Task Management versus Denial Management

The process of medical accounts receivable (A/R) management is truly a misnomer. In a perfect world, accounts receivable would require nothing more than collection—not management or process. However with growing complexity, payment ambiguity, payer plans, co-pays, co-insurance and other factors that drive up costs in healthcare delivery, the management of the accounts receivable process continues to demand more attention. With an average of 30 percent in denial rates and informed speculation of 15 percent in lost revenues on an annual basis, we must conclude that the management processes currently in place are woefully inadequate and costly. Unfortunately, the national healthcare debate on improvement does not address the A/R  management process (or lack thereof) where significant cost savings could achieved.

Symptoms of an Infirm Process

According to most industry publications, the majority of medical providers collect a portion of their charges within 60 to 70 days from the date of service as compared to five to 10 days required of most retail service providers. Why the difference?

  • On average, medical providers have over 60 various contracts with payers for services
rendered that do not typically include the reimbursement amounts.

  • Each patient has a unique status within annual healthcare insurance plans as it relates to
eligibility, allowables, network status, coinsurance, and covered services—factors not available to medical providers in advance of the visit with any consistency or clarity from the various payers.

  • The allowables and eligibility are reset and, in many cases, change annually. This eliminates
any consistency from payer, procedure and patient over the years.

  • A 30 percent denial or reject rate for services rendered would incur significant financial
hardship on the provider.

  • The cost of collection approximates 20 percent of the benefit. To justify this cost, each
claim requires an average cycle process of two to four times from provider to payer to resolve the balance owed. If the cycle cost were $5.00 each, the average cost would be from $10.00 - $20.00. With an estimate of $100.00 paid per cycle, the cost would be 10 percent to 20 percent. These figures are substantially higher than the cost of collection for other retail service providers.


The result of these simple factors creates the increasing demand for accounts receivable management systems to clear a path through this murky process. Today, there are two competing methods to manage the process. They are Task Management and Denial Management.

Account receivable managment - what is task management

Task Management

Task Management is embedded within the majority of commercial practice management or receivable management systems. This methodology lifts or queues accounts within the existing accounts receivable based upon some user defined rules in order to serve up an account to be worked. For example, all surgeries for a particular physician—let’s say “Dr. Smith”—greater than 60 days old would be a task queue or segmentation of accounts to be worked. This technology is a great improvement over working a simple accounts receivable aging from highest to lowest dollar, whereby the bottom half of the list never gets touched due to the size and scope of the entire list.

Strengths
  • Achieves a segmentation of the A/R to allocate among the billing staff
  • Provides the billing manager with some basis of evaluating employee productivity,
efficiency, effectiveness

  • Provides responsibility for a particular work queue
  • Allows flexibility to create multiple queues

Weaknesses

  • Tendency to have too many, duplicate queues and duplicative work
  • Embedded within the system are work queues that must be updated to insure queue logic
does not omit/drop new information
  • Does not segment claims production issues from receivables
  • Little or no capture of denial consistency by payer, provider or procedure
  • Does not provide a means to develop and implement denial action rules
  • Can promote “just working an account” for work’s sake versus resolving an account; in other
words, an analyst might be more focused on touching that charge and adding notes than
collecting money, progressing its status, by identifying reasons for denials and fixing them
  • Does not facilitate denial reporting to improve the entire billing process
  • Little improvement in billing efficiency per full-time equivalent employee (FTE)
  • A/R is dependant upon embedded PMS systems

Denial managment process

Denial Management

Denial Management is a new process methodology whereby patterns and consistencies within denied transactions are analyzed and resolved in a batch process regardless of the account. For example, United Healthcare is denying all supply charges for knee arthroscopies as bundled for our Dr. Smith at his primary location. A denial management methodology will provide all open balances (balances not equal to zero) of accounts receivable that meet these conditions. The billing staff will analyze and resolve these conditions in one action based on a denial reason rather than account by account within a certain queue.

Strengths
  • Provides a reporting vehicle to reduce incoming denials within the provider RCM process
  • Allows capture of the consistency in transaction denials by provider, payer, procedure, date
and reason
  • Improves claim throughput per FTE by three to four times
  • Segments claims production issues from A/R issues
  • Bypasses embedded, queue-based rules in practice management systems to eliminate
duplication and provide the ability to pull all receivables with all balances for analysis
  • Allows view of credit balances within a provider or practice
  • Allows for development and implementation of denial adjudication rules to manage
certain conditions
  • Easier process to train new staff
  • Derives A/R independently from embedded practice management applications
Weaknesses
  • Requires integrated payment posting and imaging and indexing of correspondence to fully
optimize the process


Denial Management

Denial Management isolates and eliminates the traditional excuses in accounts receivable for healthcare by forcing action to resolve accounts versus just working accounts. Clear, definable accountability from the denial management process is a critical benefit in addition to the other benefits.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Type of denial - difference between rejection and denial

Claim denial types

There is no particular type in denial however below are the common reason
Claim might be denied for incorrect coding information.
Claim might be denied for incorrect provider information.
Claim might be denied for incorrect coverage information
Claim might be denied for lack of information



Claim denials by managed care organization plague long-term care providers
Should be file the claim to patient HMO plan

Claim denied for coordination of benefits
Patient needs to update the COB information to insurance. If patient has more than one insurance, patient need to call the insurance and inform that which insurance is primary and secondary for patient. Patient only can update the COB information to insurance.

Claim denied for maximum benefits reached
File the claim to secondary along with denied EOB. If patient do not have another insurance we can bill the patient.

Claim denied for valid referral
Should be file the claim with valid referral. If we do not have valid referral number, we can request the same from referring doctor and refile the claim with valid referral.

 Claim denied no billing code.
Kindly call the insurance and get the reason behind the denials and get the correct CPT

Denied benefits is not covered by the patient's plan.
 We can bill the patient.


Denied insurance claims due to invalid cpt code
     Should be file the claim with valid CPT. For example medicare and HMO plans (Humana, freedom health, AVMED, universal, wellcare, Polk county, PUP,) does not cover the consultation code (99241 to 99245 and 99251 to 99255).

Claim denied reason dates of service over one year from process date are not payable.
    Should be file the claim with in timely filing limit. If you received the denial even filed the claim with in TFL we can appeal the claim with TFL proof. All insurances has separate filing limit.

 Claim denial codes and what action needs to be taken
Each denied claim should have valid reason behind the claim denial and needs to take appropriate action from the denials

 Claim denial vs claim rejection
Claim denied by insurance and claim rejected by clearing house OR EDI department

Claim denials bundling inclusive
Needs to differentiate the service by using appropriate modifier and Dx else taken write-off the claim balance

Claim denied primary paid in full
Need to write-off the claim balance.

Claim denied as - inclusive, maximum per unit, injury liablity and pre existing

Claim denials for maximum units per visit

Check your units of the CPT. Check LCD Guidelines for Maximum unit. We can appeal the claim with document supports for additional units of service.

Sometime claim submitted with wrong units by mistakes, correct the unit and resubmit the claim.

Dialysis Services requires one service line per a date of service with a maximum unit of one for dialysis services. If a claim is received with a date span billing multiple units on a single charge line, the charge line will be denied


Claim denied as inclusive with the primary procedure

Some service covered with primary procedure, Hence we needs to taken write off the claim balance after primary CPT paid. However there is chance with resubmit the inclusive procedure with modifier.

Check whether its a mutually inclusive CPT, If not resubmit with appropriate Modifier or changes in ICD code. If it is Bundled CPT code, please write off it.






Mutually inclusive

 Certain procedures are commonly performed in conjunction with other procedures as a component of the overall service provided. An incidental procedure is one  that is performed at the same time as a more complex primary procedure and is clinically integral to the successful outcome of the primary procedure. An assumption of same anatomic site is made during the auditing process. Due to previous  treatment, if foreign materials such as nails, rods, or screws were implanted, their removal may be required during a current primary surgical intervention. Also, the implanted wires, pins, screws, or rods located in the operative site  may now be causing pain or infection. Thus, removal of previously implanted devices/materials is clinically integral to the successful outcome of the primary procedure and do not warrant separate reimbursement. This logic is  supported by the CMS guideline for Fractures found in the National Correct Coding Policy Manual for Part B Medicare Carriers, Chapter IV that states, "There are CPT codes (20670 and 20680) for removal of internal fixation devices (e.g., pin,  rod). These codes are not separately reportable if the removal is performed as a necessary integral component of another procedure. For example, if revision of an open fracture repair for nonunion or malunion of bone requires removal  of a previously inserted pin, CPT code 20670 or 20680 is not separately reportable."





What are the Column 1/Column 2 PTP Code Pair Tables?

Although the Column 2 code is often a component of a more comprehensive Column 1 code, this relationship is not true for many edits. In the latter type of edit, the PTP code pair edit simply represents two codes that should not be reported together, unless an appropriate modifier is used. For example, a provider should not report a vaginal hysterectomy code and total abdominal hysterectomy code together.

Many procedure codes should not be reported together because they are mutually exclusive of each other. Mutually exclusive procedures cannot reasonably be performed at the same anatomic site or same beneficiary encounter.

An example of a mutually exclusive situation is the repair of an organ that can be performed by two different methods. Only one method can be chosen to repair the organ. A second example is a service that can be reported as an initial service or a subsequent service. With the exception of drug administration services, the initial service and subsequent service cannot be reported at the same beneficiary encounter.

In addition, the descriptor of some HCPCS/CPT codes includes a gender-specific restriction on the use of the code. HCPCS/CPT codes specific for one gender should not be reported with HCPCS/CPT codes for the opposite gender.

Claim denied due to pre-existing condition
Member has Preexisting Condition on DOS for Diagnosis

Patient needs to update the medical (medical history) document to insurance and provider also update the medical document to insurance. as soon as you receive the denial,  check with insurance on the pre-existing condition. If the patient has secondary coverage with the secondary if we can send the entire bill to secondary along with the primary denial.  Some carriers may be willing to pay for the same.  If the patient has no secondary coverage/ secondary refused to pay the request you to bill the patient.



Claim denied as services not provided or authorized by designated

File the claim along with appropriate authorization#. Check all the documents as sometime Authorization number has been mentioned in Medical record. If we don’t have authorization# sometimes we can appeal the claim along with necessary medical document.




Claim denied because of incorrect medical coding
Should be file the claim with correct diagnosis (Dx) and CPT



Claim denied because this injury is the liability of the no-fault carrier.

Should be file the claim to patient auto-insurance.



Claim denied by medicaid because primary insurance changed

File the claim to patient primary insurance. If we don’t have patient primary insurance details needs to call the patient and get the insurance information.



Claim denied by medicare for code co-16 what do i do to get this paid?
      We will receive this denial if we have filed the claim with insufficient information. This code co-16 must have additional denials information that informs us what kind of information is missing with claim.





Claim denied for clia certification#
Should be file the claim with clia certification number. We must file the lab code with clia number.

What is denial managment soloution


 Denial :

Denial is the technical term used for the non-payment of a claim by the insurance. The insurance usually pays the claim if the details presented to them are sufficient enough for processing. If there is any lack of information then the insurance quotes a reason for which the claim is not considered for payment which is known to be the denial reason. These reasons are found in the EOB. Some insurance like Medicare follow a general set of denial codes which is uniform across all the states. But some commercial insurance follow their own set of reasons codes for the denials which will be clearly mentioned in the EOB.

For Example:-


If the claim has gone to the insurance without the patient date of birth then the insurance will not pay the claim stating a denial reason code to it.

Denial Management Solution

A good denial management process is not simply about working denials, it is about systematically gathering the data required to eliminate denials. Working denials is like pumping water from your basement when a pipe bursts. Denial management is about fixing the pipe so you no longer need to pump water from the basement.

We also understand that achieving powerful results from denial management requires data, data and more data. Our denial management process reports and measures all claims that are being denied by your payers. With this level of data our Denial Management specialists can fix the issues that are leading to the denials (whether it be issues with the claims or issues with the payers) and stop the torrent of unpaid claims into your medical billing process. Once we do this, then revenues for your practice will increase; probably by 10 to 20 percent.

Over the years we have learn that three elements are typically missing from a practice or medical Provider's denial management process: data, filtering/sorting methodologies and feedback to systematically correct errors. Most practices & practice management systems do not properly track denials - at least not in the form in which they are typically used (i.e., they may have the capability, but only if properly implemented and used). The practice management systems that do track denials typically overwhelm the practice with data that is difficult to utilize for high level denial management. Finally, even if the data is captured and can be properly utilized, most practices do not have a systematic way to get the information back into the billing process in a manner that prevents the denials from occurring again in the future.

Our Denial management Process tracks every claim that has denied and can report this by payer, by CPT, by physician and by diagnosis. This information is presented in a manner that allows fast identification of trends. With this powerful combination in hand, the Practice / Provider of medical service can then utilizes claim rules and edits that are specific enough to dramatically drive up the first pass claim acceptance and stop the flood of denied claims. Our in depth analysis described above also allows payers that are habitual violators of Clean Claim Rules to be identified and pursued. The data and analysis will allow many opportunities for process improvements and revenue enhancement for the practice.

If you implement our powerful Denial Management Solution you can optimize your medical billing and speed up your cash flow. As previously mentioned, our strong denial management solution can increase your collections by 20 percent or more.

As Denial management is a subsection to Accounts Receivables of any medical facility, we religiously follow the below methodology of managing denials from payers. Our solution is focused around the three key fundamentals to effective denial management.

  • Prevention
  • Analysis
  • Tracking and Trend Management

Three key fundamentals to effective denial management

The three key fundamentals to effective denial management.

Prevention

Prevention focuses on actions that can be taken upstream in the patient encounter to prevent denials from occurring in the first place. Prevention can be introduced anywhere in the patient encounter such as: Pre-admit/Pre-registration, Scheduling, Admit/Registration and Billing. Our denial management experts ensure that we track such trends and keep the Client informed periodically about improvements/process changes that can be made across functions.

Analysis

The process of analyzing and aggregating similar denials is strategic in denial management. The Denial management team understands that analysis and segregation is a forerunner to follow-up process and hence for us it is an fundamental step in denial management.

Tracking and Trend Management

Besides keeping a track of the denial trend from payers our experts also actively monitor the payment patterns from various payers and set-up a mechanism to alert when a deviation from the normal trend is seen. This is important in understanding the causes of claim denials and enhancing long-term efficiency and drastically reducing lost revenue.

Common Insurance denial reason

Some of the Common Insurance Denials

Claim denied for Missing / Additional information
Claim denied as Duplicate
Claim denied for Prior-Authorization / Referral:
Claim Denied as Inclusive
Claim denied as included in Global period
Claim denied as not medically necessary / Pended for medical notes
Claim denied as non covered service
Claim denied for eligibility
Claim denied for late filing
Claim denied as CPT - Dx mismatch
Claim denied / Pending for accident information: (Workmen's Compensation)

most common mistakes - Filing adjustment form

The most common mistakes that are made when filing adjustments are these:

• Incomplete or invalid MID information or ICNs
• Multiple ICNs on the same form
• Unspecified or too-general reason for the adjustment request
• Missing copy of the RA related to the request
• Missing reference to the original ICN, or use of a denied adjustment ICN
• A partial payment or partial recoupment number is not referenced as the original ICN
• Filing the adjustment after the 18-month time limit
Note: If an adjustment is not filed until the 17th month from the date of service, the original claim may no longer be available in the system for adjustment. Submit adjustments as soon as possible so they can be processed within the 18-month time limit.
• Missing required documentation (Medicare vouchers, medical records, operative records, etc).
• Referencing the NPI on the adjustment request

Note: This form requests the MPN in the blank specified for Provider Number.

Filing adjustment form of Medicare

Tips for Filing Adjustments

The following tips will assist in completing the adjustment form

• Complete only one adjustment request form per claim; a separate adjustment request form for each line item on a single claim is not necessary.

• Reference only one ICN per adjustment request form.

• If requesting a review of a previously denied adjustment, reference the original ICN and resubmit with all supporting documentation related to the adjustment. Do not reference the ICN for the denied adjustment.

• Include a copy of the appropriate RA with each adjustment request. If multiple RAs were involved in the claim payment process, include copies of each RA.

• Include a copy of the claim that is referenced on the adjustment request.
Note: This is not required for electronically submitted claims.

• When the adjustment request involves a corrected or revised claim, send both the original and revised claim. Do not obliterate previously paid details on the claim.

• Include pertinent information on a separate sheet of paper. Do not write information on the back of the adjustment form, RAs, etc.

• Ensure that all of the information submitted with the adjustment request is legible.

• Send only the medical records that pertain to the services rendered. If it is necessary to send records with other information included, identify the portion of the record that is significant to the adjustment request.

• Only the claim that pertains to the payment or denial in question should be submitted with the adjustment request. Do not submit any other claims with the adjustment request. Claims for service dates that have not been submitted should be filed on a new day claim, including late charges for codes not previously filed.

• When submitting an adjustment to Medicaid due to a Medicare-adjusted voucher, attach both the original voucher and the adjusted Medicare voucher. Reference the ICN of the original voucher.

• If requesting a review of a previous partial payment or a partial recoup adjustment, reference the ICN for the adjustment and resubmit with all supporting documentation related to the adjustment.

• Adjustments equal to or less than $1.00 will be denied.

When we need to appal and how to appeal the claims

The Appeals Process

When an insurer denies or underpays a claim, first examine the original claim and the Explanation of
Benefits (EOB) to determine whether there is inaccurate or insufficient information. Claims denied for
these reasons can simply be resubmitted with the corrected or additional data required.

Should a payer deny a claim for some other reason, consider filing an appeal. Industry sources indicate
that only 10% of claims are appealed, but that 90% of appeals are successful. In fact, according to an
Office of the Inspector General report, there has been an increase in appeals to Medicare at the
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) level (99% increase); in these appeals, 81% of the initial denials
were overturned.

By law, all payers must have a procedure for filing appeals. Below is the process for filing an appeal for
claims submitted under Medicare Part B. The process begins with a request to review the claim and, if
needed, can progress to a hearing at various levels. Note time and claim limits on various levels of the
appeal process.


The Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Appeals Process

Providers who disagree with a determination on a Part B claim have the right to appeal the claim.
When appealing a claim, the following information should be submitted:

> Beneficiary name
> Medicare Health Insurance Claim (HIC) number
> Date of initial determination
> Date(s) of service for which the initial determination was issued
> An explanation of why you have requested a review
> A copy of the claim and the EOB or remittance notice
> Supporting documentation
> Signature of the requester

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) established a
process for the correction of minor errors or omissions without pursuing an appeal. Requests for
adjustments to claims resulting from clerical errors shall be handled and processed by the contractor
through telephone reopenings.

The Part B appeals process consists of 5 levels, as listed below. Each level must be completed prior to
proceeding to the next level of appeal. An appeal cannot be made until the provider receives an initial
determination from the Medicare carrier. Keep in mind that specific time constraints, as well as minimum
dollar amounts in controversy, exist at the various appeal levels


Appeal Level                            Time Limit                                                        Amount in Controversy

1. Redetermination*     120 days from date of receipt of the notice of initial determination     None    

2. Reconsideration by Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC)     180 days from date of receipt of the redetermination     None    

3. Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Hearing     60 days from date of receipt of the reconsideration     At least $110    

4. Departmental Appeals Board (DAB) Review     60 days from date of receipt of the ALJ hearing decision     None    

5. Federal Court Review     60 days from date of receipt of DAB decision or declination of review by DAB     At least $1,090   

Top Five DME MAC Claim Denials for Podiatry Specialty

The top five denials below are for the period of October 2008 through December 2008. These claims were
identified from Specialty 48, which represents Podiatrists. The denials identified are for all of DME
MAC Jurisdiction A Suppliers

Top FiveClaim Denials     # of Denied Claims     Reason For Denial      

CO 96, N115                                       2,371     This decision was based on a Local Coverage Determination (LCD). An LCD provides a guide to assist in determining whether a particular item or service is covered. Non-covered charge(s)    

CO 18, N111                                      2,409     This service was included in a claim that was previously billed and adjudicated. No appeal rights are attached to the denial of this service to determine whether the service/item is a duplicate. Duplicate claim/service    

CO 58                                                   978     Treatment was deemed by the payer to have been rendered in an inappropriate or invalid place of service    

CO 4                                                        701     The procedure code is inconsistent with the modifier used, or a required modifier is missing     

CO 16, MA130                                         685     Your claim contains incomplete and/or invalid information, and no appeal rights are afforded because the claim is unprocessable. Claim/service  lacks information which is needed for adjudication   

Denial EOB example

Here is the image for denial EOB from Medicare insurance.


 Medicare Denial EOB example

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

How to review EOB - AR specialist

Explanation of Benefit (or Remittance Notice) Analysis

> Determine why the claim was denied by analyzing the denial codes, which are usually on the bottom or back of the EOB

> Cross-reference actual reimbursement from the payer to their allowables to determine if the claim was underpaid, paid correctly, or overpaid. Allowables are often published in provider bulletins or in your contract with the payer

> If the payer has changed any of your codes, you may want to go back and review how you’re using those codes and whether they are being used appropriately

> Take care to file appeals within the time constraints of the payer (for Medicare, the limit for appeals is 120 days from the date of initial denial); keep in mind that a payer may require a specific appeal form to be submitted

How to success in denial management

Claims Denial Management

Claims may be denied or underpaid for a variety of reasons.

Common reasons for denial or underpayment may include the following:

> Clerical errors, such as misspellings and transposed numbers

> Questions about medical necessity

> Improper use of diagnosis codes

> Incorrect procedure codes and/or modifiers

> Missing information

> Incorrect billing units

Insurance payers typically have a formal process that permits providers to appeal denied claims or inadequate reimbursement for drugs and/or services. If your claim is denied, you will receive an EOB from your local insurance claims processor explaining the reason(s) for noncoverage. You may resubmit the claim, requesting a redetermination of coverage. 

A well-written appeal letter can be very effective in obtaining appropriate reimbursement for a denied or an underpaid claim. Resubmitted claims should fully document the medical necessity for the patient in question and should include any supplemental information that may not have been included with the original claim.

Review Contracts Comprehensively

When assessing contracts, make sure the hospital can comply with the terms and identify provisions that might generate a high proportion of denials. Pay close attention to terms and limits for appeals. Members of the denial management team should participate in the hospital’s contract review process to ensure that contracts commit the facility to realistic and achievable goals from both contracting entities.

Insurance claims recovery process

Claims Recovery

A claims recovery process is essential and should incorporate all traditional processes to recover the denied payment, including informal reviews, fair hearings, administrative law judge hearings, appeal council hearings, and federal district court hearings. All levels of appeal have specific timelines,
document requirements, and dollar limits. A cost-benefit analysis should be used to determine the level of resources needed to pursue the denied claim. Use the following tips to assist each facility with claims recovery:

> Establish a department coordinator to direct all communications regarding claims recovery. This team member will ensure an efficient and timely appeal process

> Understand and meet all payer requirements for information submission. Failure to meet these timelines will result in automatic denials

> Designate one contact person to communicate with Medicare, Medicaid, and each commercial insurer

> When an employee specializes in one specific payer, he/she is more likely to be familiar with  payer-specific requirements regarding appeals and information submission

> Focus appeal efforts on denials with the greatest likelihood of being reversed

> Develop a template for appealing denials questioning medical necessity

> Reach out to patient assistance programs for appeals support. Such services can reduce time and effort on the part of the hospital and increase the likelihood of successful appeals

Friday, July 2, 2010

Avoiding denial - claim review before submission

Common Problems and Solutions

When a denial or underpayment is received from a payer, it’s often necessary to review the original claim
submitted to the payer along with the EOB to identify and correct the problem. By doing this type of
analysis, you can determine if there was a simple coding error or if the denial was based upon
something else, such as the payer’s coverage policy on a specific procedure or product. Here are some
items to keep in mind when reviewing the original claim and EOB.

1. Original Claim Analysis

> Review the claim to ensure that all codes are complete and accurate

—ICD-9-CM codes are listed and coded to the highest level of specificity
(don’t use a truncated ICD-9-CM code when a more specific code is available)

—ICD-9-CM codes are linked to each service line on the claim form

—J and Q codes for drug products are listed and units are accurately billed

—CPT codes reflect the services provided during the patient encounter

—Modifiers are used as necessary

—The most recent volumes of each of the coding books are used as a reference;
out-of-date codes can result in denials
> Examine your charges; most payers will reimburse the lesser of their allowable or your charges

—Verify that date of service and place of service are correct

—Include correct names and provider identification numbers of both referring and treating
providers on the claim

—Be sure you’ve billed the right payer, especially if the patient has primary and secondary insurers

—Confirm you have the signature of the patient on file and the treating physician’s signature on
the claim

Hospital Denials - review

Today, as hospitals face tremendous reimbursement challenges, many facilities are adopting best
practices in denials management. This approach helps to recapture the full value of the services they
provide to patients.

Most hospitals recognize that resubmitting a claim does not solve their claims denial problems and are
seeking to quantify the issue to improve overall claim payments. With this goal in mind, more and more
hospitals are forming denial recovery units, maintaining denials databases for tracking and trending
purposes, automating where possible, and centralizing operations to increase efficiency and decrease
error rates.

The Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (PPS) created under the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997 has increased pressure on hospitals to bill accurately for outpatient hospital services. Under
PPS, the Medicare payment methodology was changed first from a cost-to-charge ratio structure to a
prospective payment system for services based on historical claims data per Current Procedure
Technology (CPT) or the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS). This change represents
a dramatic shift in the billing process for hospitals, as the majority of these codes are generated through
the charge description master, rather than through the health information management department. This
transfer in coding responsibility without commensurate training, support, and monitoring of staff
involved is perhaps the greatest cause of service-level denials for outpatient claims today.

In addition, hospitals may be confronted with additional payment cuts, estimated at $21 billion over the
next 5 years, if Congress does not enact legislative changes to correct the existing payment structure.
To remain viable in this challenging environment, hospitals must take a closer look at the claims denial
issues they face internally.

Dispute insurance denial - Types of hospital Denials

Insurance claim denials generally fall into 2 major categories: claim-level denials and service-level denials. Medicare and Medicaid have created a set of status codes to indicate why claims have been denied. Appropriate hospital staff members involved in billing and coding should be familiar with these
codes and what they mean to the organization. Code information can be found at the CMS Web site: www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/IOM/list.asp.

Denial of the entire claim is considered a claim-level denial. For many hospitals, this type of problem accounts for the majority of Medicare and Medicaid denials and typically results from inaccuracies related to patient registration, late-charge management, duplicate billing, production of medical
information for external review, and/or physicians’ ordering practices. Common denial types include the following:

> The patient was not identified as insured
> The claim submitted was a duplicate
> The services were deemed by the payer as not medically necessary
> The charges for outpatient services were in proximity to inpatient services
> The patient’s date of death preceded the date of service

A service-level denial occurs when any portion of the claim associated with an individual service is denied. Service-level denials often result from problems with patient registration, questions of medical necessity, issues related to local medical review policies, and inaccurate diagnostic and procedural
coding processes. Typical reasons for denial include:

> The claim is denied based on diagnosis
> The procedure code used is inconsistent with the modifier, or information is missing
> The service is considered not medically necessary by the payer
> The service is not paid separately. Problems with claims that originate during patient registration are common because this function is decentralized in many healthcare organizations, particularly for outpatient services. Therefore, denied claims often result from process breakdowns due to inadequate interdepartmental communication or failure to learn from the experience of previous denials. Repeated denials within hospital systems occur frequently for the same patient and typically happen for several reasons. For example, the registration staff may be using out-of-date demographic data and may not be informed of the original denial. Denials related to deceased
patients are often due to poor management of late charges, as these charges may be entered into the system using the date of data entry as the date of service instead of listing the actual date the patient received treatment. Denials related to medical necessity and failure to provide information
are usually due to inaccurate diagnostic coding (ICD-9) and/or insufficient medical record documentation to support the services billed

What is clean claim - how long to take paid

A “clean” claim is defined as a one that does not require the payer to investigate or develop on a prepayment basis. Clean claims must be filed in the timely filing period.

Most payers consider clean claims as:

◆ Claims that pass all edits

◆ Claims that do not require external development (i.e., are investigated within the claims, medical review, or payment office even if the investigator does not need to contact the provider, the beneficiary, or other outside source)

◆ Claims not approved for payment by the common working file (CWF) within seven days of the original claim submittal for reasons beyond the carrier’s or provider’s control (e.g., CWF system/communication difficulties) (Medicare only)

◆ Claims where the beneficiary is not on the CWF host and CWF has to locate and identify where the beneficiary record resides (CWF out-of-service area [OSA] claims) (Medicare only)

◆ Claims subject to medical review but complete medical evidence is attached by the provider

◆ Additional requests for information is developed on a post payment basis

◆ Have all basic information necessary to adjudicate the claim, and all required
supporting documentation is attached

Elements of a Clean Claim

1. Clean claim defined: A clean claim has no defect, impropriety or special circumstance, including incomplete documentation that delays timely payment. A provider submits a clean claim by providing the required data elements on the standard claims forms, along with any attachments and additional elements, or revisions to data elements,  attachments and additional elements, of which the provider has knowledge. Claims for inpatient and facility programs and services are to be submitted on the UB-04 and  claims for individual professional procedures and services are to be submitted on the CMS-1500. State guidelines may supersede these requirements. In addition, claims may be submitted electronically through a contracted clearinghouse or on Magellan’s Webbased claims submission application. Magellan does not typically, but may require attachments or other information in addition to these standard forms (as noted below). Magellan may request treatment records for review.

2. Required clean claim elements: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed claim forms that record the information needed to process and generate provider reimbursement. The required elements of a clean claim must be complete, legible and accurate.

CMS-1500

In the following line item description, the parenthetical information following each term is a reference to the field number to which that term corresponds on the CMS-1500 claim form. For more information about the CMS-1500 form, visit the National Uniform Claim Committee’s website. Note that Magellan can only accept the current version of the CMS-1500 form.

• Subscriber’s/patient’s plan ID number (field 1a);
• Patient’s name (field 2);
• Patient’s date of birth and gender (field 3);
• Subscriber’s name (field 4);
• Patient’s address (street or P.O. Box, city, zip) (field 5);
• Patient’s relationship to subscriber (field 6);
• Subscriber’s address (street or P.O. Box, City, Zip Code) (field 7);
• Whether patient’s condition is related to employment, auto accident, or other accident (field 10);
• Subscriber’s policy number (field 11);
• Subscriber’s birth date and gender (field 11a);
• HMO or preferred provider carrier name (field 11c);
• Disclosure of any other health benefit plans (field 11d);
• Patient’s or authorized person’s signature or notation that the signature is on file with the physician or provider (field 12);
• Subscriber’s or authorized person’s signature or notation that the signature is on file
with the physician or provider (field 13);
• Date of current illness, injury, or pregnancy (field 14);
• First date of previous, same or similar illness (field 15);
• Name of Referring Provider or Other Source (field 17);
• Referring Provider NPI Number (field 17b);
• Diagnosis codes or nature of illness or injury (current ICD-10 codes are required effective 10/1/15) (field 21);
• Date(s) of service (field 24A);
• Place of service codes (field 24B);
• EMG (field 24C);
• Procedure/modifier code (current CPT or HCPCS codes are required) (field 24D);
• Diagnosis code (ICD-10 codes are required effective 10/1/15) by specific service (field 24E);
• Charge for each listed service (field 24F);
• Number of days or units (field 24G);
• Rendering provider NPI (field 24J);
• Physician’s or provider’s federal taxpayer ID number (field 25);
• Total charge (field 28);
• Signature of physician or provider that rendered service, including indication of professional license (e.g., MD, LCSW, etc.) or notation that the signature is on file with the HMO or preferred provider carrier (field 31);
• Name and address of facility where services rendered (if other than home or office) (field 32);
• The service facility Type 1 NPI (if different from main or billing NPI) (field 32a);
• Physician’s or provider’s billing name and address (field 33); and
• Main or billing Type 1 NPI number (field 33a).


Definitions

"Clean" Claim vs. "Non-Clean" Claim:

A claim for payment of health care services that is submitted via an acceptable claim form or electronic format with all required fields completed with accurate and complete information in accordance with the insurer's requirements, is considered "clean" if the following conditions are met:

I. the services must be eligible, provided by an eligible provider and provided to a person covered by the insurer;

II. the claim has no material defect or impropriety, including, but not limited to any lack of required substantiating documentation or incorrect coding;

III. there is no dispute regarding the amount claimed;

IV. the payer has no reason to believe that the claim was submitted fraudulently or there is no material misrepresentation;

V. the claim does not require special treatment or review that would prevent the timely payment of the claim;

VI. the claim does not require coordination of benefits, subrogation, or other third party liability;

VII. services must be incurred during a time where the premium is not delinquent (this condition does not apply to BlueCHiP for Medicare members).

If additional documentation (e.g., medical records) involves a source outside Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island (BCBSRI), the claim is not considered clean.

Note: Claims Management uses these criteria to insure that all claims, from both contracted and noncontracted providers, are paid within expected timeframes as outlined by contracts and regulatory agencies.

Clean Claim Summary

A claim that can be processed without obtaining additional information from the provider of the service or its designated representative. It includes a claim with errors originating in a state’s claims system. It does not include a claim from a provider who is under investigation for fraud or abuse, or a claim under review for medical necessity.


Prompt Payment

 The Plan shall ensure that clean claims are paid within 30 days of the date of receipt by the Plan. The Plan and the provider may, however, agree to an alternative payment schedule, provided the alternative payment schedule is reviewed and approved by the state of Hawai’i Department of Health Services (DHS). The Plan shall pay interest (according to the interest rate provided by the DHS) for all clean claims that are not paid within these required time frames


Definition of a Clean Claim


In order to be eligible for Prompt Pay penalties, providers must submit a clean claim. A clean claim includes all the data elements specified by the TDI in prompt pay rules or applicable electronic standards. Each specified data element must be legible, accurate, and complete.

For non-electronic submissions by institutional providers, a claim should be submitted using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form UB-04.1 The UB-04 claim form must include all the required data elements set forth in TDI rules,2 including, if applicable, the amount paid by the primary plan.3

For non- electronic submissions by professional providers, a claim shall be submitted on a CMS Form 1500(02/12) claim form.

Electronic claims by professional or institutional providers must be submitted using the ASC X12N 837 format in order to be considered a clean claim. Providers must submit the claim in compliance with the Federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements related to electronic health care claims, including applicable implementation guidelines, companion guides, and trading partner agreements.4

A claim that does not comply with the applicable standard is a deficient claim and will not be penalty eligible.5 When Blue Essentials, Blue Advantage HMO and Blue Premier are unable to process a deficient claim, it will notify the provider of the deficiency and request the correct data element.

At times, deficient claims contain sufficient information for BCBSTX’s adjudication and payment. Rather than requiring the provider to correct the deficiency before payment is issued, BCBSTX considers it in the best interest of providers to pay deficient claims as soon as possible. However, because deficient claims are not clean claims, they are not eligible for penalties even if BCBSTX pays the claim outside of the applicable payment period.6



Throughout this provider manual there will be instances when there are references unique to Blue Essentials, Blue Advantage HMO and Blue Premier. These product specific requirements will be noted with the product name.

When a contracting provider submits a clean claim that meets all the requirements for Texas Prompt Pay Act coverage, the insurer must pay the claim within 30 days if it was submitted in electronic format and within 45 days if it was submitted in non-electronic format.7 If a claim is deficient, the statutory period does not commence unless and until the provider corrects the unclean data element(s). The payment period for clean corrected claims is determined by the format of the corrected submission, without regard to the manner in which the original claim was received.

Blue Essentials, Blue Advantage HMO and Blue Premier may extend the applicable statutory payment by requesting additional information from the treating provider within thirty days of receiving a clean claim.8 Such a request suspends the payment period until the requested response is received.9 Blue Essentials, Blue Advantage HMO and Blue Premier must then pay any eligible charges within the longer of (1) fifteen days, or (2) the number of days remaining in the original payment period at the time the request was sent.10

There are three (3) tiers of penalty calculation under the Texas Prompt Pay Act, depending on when the claim was paid. For claims submitted by institutional providers, half of the amount calculated in each tier is owed to the provider and the other half is owed to the Texas Department of Insurance.11

Tier 1: For payments 1 - 45 days late, the total penalty is equal to 50 percent of the difference between the billed charges and the contracted rate.12

Tier 2: For payments 46 – 90 days late, the total penalty is equal to 100 percent of the difference between the billed charges and the contracted rate.13

Tier 3: For payments more than 90 days late, the total penalty is equal to the 
Tier 2 amount plus 18% annual interest on that amount, accruing from the date payment was due to the date the claim and penalty are paid in full.14

Submitting Accurate Claims

Health care professionals and suppliers play a vital role in protecting the integrity of the Medicare Program by submitting accurate claims, maintaining current knowledge of Medicare billing policies, and ensuring all documentation required to support the medical need for the service rendered is submitted when requested by the MAC.

In addition to correct claims completion, Medicare payment requires that an item or service:
• Meets a benefit category
• Is not specifically excluded from coverage
• Is reasonable and necessary

In general fraud is defined as making false statements or representations of material facts to obtain some benefit or payment for which no entitlement would otherwise exist.

ASCA Exceptions: Before submitting a hard copy claim on the Form CMS-1500, health care professionals and suppliers are required to self-assess to determine whether they meet one or more of the ASCA exceptions. For example, health care professionals and suppliers that have fewer than10 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) employees and bill a MAC are considered to be small and might therefore qualify to be exempt from Medicare electronic billing requirements. If a health care professional or supplier meets an exception, there is no need to submit a waiver request.


Waiver Requests: There are other situations when the ASCA electronic billing requirement could be waived for some or all claims, such as if disability of all members of a health care professional’s or supplier’s staff prevents use of a computer for electronic submission of claims. Health care professionals and suppliers must obtain Medicare preapproval to submit paper claims in these situations by submitting a waiver request to their MAC.


Clean claim definition for UB 04

Clean claim defined: A clean claim has no defect, impropriety or special circumstance, including incomplete documentation that delays timely payment. A provider submits a clean claim by providing the required data elements on the standard claims forms, along with any attachments and additional elements, or revisions to data elements, attachments and additional elements, of which the provider has knowledge. Claims for inpatient and facility programs and services are to be submitted on the UB-04 and claims for individual professional procedures and services are to be submitted on the CMS-1500. State guidelines may supersede these requirements. In addition, claims may be submitted electronically through a contracted clearinghouse or on Magellan’s webbased claims submission application. Magellan does not typically, but may require attachments or other information in addition to these standard forms (as noted below). Magellan may request treatment records for review.

Required clean claim elements: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed claim forms that record the information needed to process and generate provider reimbursement. The required elements of a clean claim must be complete, legible and accurate.

UB-04

The UB-04 form captures essential data elements for providers of services in institutional/inpatient/facility settings. The form can be used to bill Medicare fiscal intermediaries, Medicaid state agencies and health plans/insurers. The required elements of a clean claim must be complete, legible and accurate. For more information about the UB-04 form, visit the National Uniform Billing Committee’s website. Contact your claim forms vendor to obtain full-color versions of the UB-04.

In the following line item description, the parenthetical information following each term is a reference to the field number to which that term corresponds on the UB-04 claim form.

• Provider’s name, address and telephone number (field 1);
• Patient control number (field 3a);
• Type of bill code (field 4);
• Provider’s federal tax ID number (field 5);
• Statement period (beginning and ending date of claim period) (field 6);
• Patient’s name (field 8);
• Patient’s address (field 9);
• Patient’s date of birth (field 10);
• Patient’s gender (field 11);
• Date of admission (field 12), required for inpatient and home health;
• Admission hour (field 13);
• Type of admission (e.g. emergency, urgent, elective, newborn) (field 14), required for inpatient;
• Source of admission code (field 15);
• Patient-status-at-discharge code (field 17);
• Value code and amounts (fields 39-41);
• Revenue code (field 42);
• Revenue/service description (field 43);
• HCPCS/Rates (current CPT or HCPCS codes are required) (field 44);
• Service date (field 45), (required for each date of facility-based non-inpatient services or itemization in a separate attachment is required);
• Units of service (field 46);
• Total charge (field 47);
• HMO or preferred provider carrier name (field 50);
• Main NPI number (field 56);
• Subscriber’s name (field 58);
• Patient’s relationship to subscriber (field 59);
• Insured’s unique ID (field 60);
• Diagnosis qualifier (field 66);
• Principal diagnosis code (ICD-10 codes are required effective 10/1/15) (field 67);
• Admit diagnosis (field 69);
• Provider name and identifiers (field 76-79). 

Situational clean claim elements: Unless otherwise agreed by contract, the data elements contained in this paragraph are necessary for claims filed by physicians or providers if circumstances exist which render the data elements applicable to the specific claim being filed. The applicability of any given data element contained in this paragraph is determined by the situation from which the claim arose.

(1) Other insured’s or enrollee’s name (CMS-1500, field 9), is applicable if patient is  covered by more than one health benefit plan. If the essential data element specified in CMS-1500, field 11d, “disclosure of any other health benefit plans,” is answered yes, this is applicable.

(2) Other insured’s or enrollee’s policy/group number (CMS-1500, field 9a), is applicable if patient is covered by more than one health benefit plan. If the essential data element specified in paragraph CMS-1500, field 11d, “disclosure of any other health benefit plans,” is answered yes, this is applicable.

(3) Other insured or enrollee date of birth (CMS-1500, field 9b), is applicable if patient is covered by more than one health benefit plan. If the essential data element specified in paragraph CMS-1500, field 11d, “disclosure of any other  health benefit plans,” is answered yes, this is applicable.

(4) Other insured or enrollee plan name (employer, school, etc.) (CMS-1500, field 9c), is applicable if patient is covered by more than one health benefit plan. If the essential data element specified in CMS-1500, field 11d, “disclosure of any other health benefit plans,” is answered yes, this is applicable. 

(5) Other insured or enrollee HMO or insurer name. If the essential data element specified in CMS-1500, field 11d, “disclosure of any other health benefit plans,” is answered yes, this is applicable.

(6) Subscriber’s plan name (employer, school, etc.) (CMS-1500, field 11b) is applicable if the health benefit plan is a group plan;

(7) Prior authorization number (CMS-1500, field 23), is applicable when prior authorization is required;

(8) Whether assignment was accepted (CMS-1500, field 27), is applicable when assignment has been accepted;

(9) Amount paid (CMS-1500, field 29), is applicable if an amount has been paid to the physician or provider submitting the claim by the patient or subscriber, or on behalf of the patient or subscriber or by a primary plan (Commercial or Medicare). When applicable, a copy of the primary plan’s EOB is required;

(10) Balance due (CMS-1500, field 30), is applicable if an amount has been paid to the physician or provider submitting the claim by the patient or subscriber, or on behalf of the patient or subscriber;

(11) Pay To name, address and ID (UB-04, field 2), required when the Pay To information is different than Billing provider info in field 1;

(12) Medical/ health record number (UB-04, field 3b), not the same as 3a;

(13) Discharge hour (UB-04, field 16), is applicable if the patient was an inpatient, or was admitted for outpatient observation;

(14) Condition codes (UB-04, fields 18-28 are applicable if the CMS UB-04 manual contains a condition code appropriate to the patient’s condition;

(15) Occurrence codes and dates (UB-04, fields 31-34), are applicable if the CMS UB- 04 manual contains an occurrence code appropriate to the patient’s condition;

(16) Occurrence span code, from and through dates (UB-04, field 35-36), is applicable if the CMS UB-04 manual contains an occurrence span code appropriate to the patient’s condition;

(17) Non-covered charges (UB-04, field 48), required when applicable;

(18) Prior payments – payer and patient (UB-04, field 54), is applicable if payments have been made to the physician or provider by the patient or another payer or subscriber, on behalf of the patient or subscriber, or by a primary plan;

(19) Diagnoses codes other than principle diagnosis code (UB-04, fields 67A-Q), is applicable if there are diagnoses other than the principle diagnosis and ICD-10 code is required effective 10/1/15;

(20) Principal procedure code and date (UB-04, field 74), required on inpatient claims when a procedure was performed; Other procedure codes and dates (UB-04, field 74a-e), required on inpatient claims when additional procedures must be reported;

(21) Ambulance trip report, submitted as an attachment to the claim; and

(22) Anesthesia report is applicable to report time spent on anesthesia services. 



Additional clean claim elements: In the event information not specified herein is required to make an accurate determination of proof of loss, the provider will be notified in writing within the applicable regulatory or contractual prompt payment standards. The notice will identify the specific claim or portion of a claim that is being reviewed and the information required. The review is completed within the applicable prompt payment standard following receipt of the information requested from the provider.

Medicare payment policy on Clean claims


Under the existing legislated payment floor, electronic media claims

(EMC) may not be paid earlier than the 14th day after the date of receipt (13-day waiting period). Non-electronic claims cannot be paid earlier than the 27th day after the date of receipt (26-day waiting period). The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requires that claims submitted electronically effective October 16, 2003 be in a format that complies with the appropriate standard adopted for national use. Claims submitted via direct data entry (DDE) where supported by a carrier or intermediary are considered to be HIPAAcompliant electronic claims.

The Administrative Simplification and Compliance Act (ASCA) requires that claims be submitted to Medicare electronically by October 16, 2003, with some exceptions. A contingency plan has been invoked to temporarily accept electronic claims in a non-HIPAA format after October 15, 2003 while submitters complete implementation and testing efforts.

To support the goal in the HHS July 24, 2003, HIPAA contingency planning document that trading partners be encouraged to comply with the HIPAA standards requirements as soon as possible, CMS is modifying application of the payment floor. Only those claims submitted electronically in a HIPAA-compliant claim format will now be considered eligible for payment as early as the 14th day after the date of receipt. All other claims, including those submitted electronically in a pre-HIPAA format under a Medicare contingency plan, will not be paid earlier than the 27th day after the date of receipt.

For CROWD workload reporting purposes, only HIPAA-compliant electronic claims may now be reported in the EMC category. Non-HIPAA compliant EMC must now be included in the total reported in the paper claims category. This payment floor differentiation between HIPAA-compliant and non-HIPAA-compliant electronic claims does not apply to the payment ceiling (30-days for all clean claims), nor to the Contractor Performance Evaluation (CPE) requirement that 95% of clean electronic (HIPAA or non-HIPAA compliant) and paper claims be processed by the statutorily specified timeframes.

The receipt date is the date the carrier or FI receives a claim on which the data are sufficiently complete to qualify as a claim. The receipt date is used to calculate interest payments when due for clean claims, to report statistical data on claims to CMS, such as in workload reports, and to determine if a claim was received timely.

Paper claims received by 5:00 p.m. on a business day, or by closing time if the carrier or FI routinely ends its public business day between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., must be considered as received on that date, even if the carrier or FI does not open the envelopes in which the claims are received or does not enter the data into the claims processing system until a later date. Paper claims received after 5:00 p.m. or the carrier or FI’s close of business between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. may be considered as received on the next business day.

Paper claims are considered received if delivered to the carrier or FI’s place of business by the U.S. Postal Service, picked up from a P.O. box(es), or otherwise delivered to the carrier or FI’s place of business by its normal close of business time. If the carrier or FI uses a P.O. box for receipt of mailed claims, it must have its mail picked up from its box(es) at least once per business day unless precluded on a particular day by the emergency closing of its office or its postal box site.

As electronic claim tapes and diskettes that may be submitted by providers or their agents to an FI are also subject to manual delivery, rather than direct electronic transmission, the paper claim receipt date establishment rule also applies to establish the date of receipt of claims submitted on such tapes and diskettes.

Electronic claims transmitted directly to a FI, carrier, or to a clearinghouse with which the FI or carrier contracts as its representative for the receipt of its claims, by 5:00 p.m. in the FI’s or carrier’s time zone, or by its closing time if it routinely closes between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., must likewise be considered as received on that day even if the FI or carrier does not upload or process the data until a later date. NOTE: The payment floor differentiation in 80.2.1.2 does not apply when establishing date of receipt. Use the same methodology to establish the date of receipt for all electronic claims.

Paper and electronic claims that do not meet the basic legibility, format, or completion requirements are not considered as received for claims processing and may be rejected from the claims processing system. Rejected claims are not considered as received until resubmitted as corrected, complete claims. The carrier or FI may not use the data entry date, the date of passage of front-end edits, the date the document control number is assigned, or any date other than the actual calendar date of receipt as described above to establish the official receipt date of any claim. 


Payment ceilings were implemented for clean claims received by the carrier or FI on or after April 1, 1987. “Clean” claims must be paid or denied within the applicable number of days from their receipt date as follows:

Time Period for Claims Received Applicable Number of Calendar Days
01-01-93 through 09-30-93 24 for EMC and 27 for paper claims
10-01-93 and later 30

All claims (i.e., paid claims, partial and complete denials, no payment bills) including PIP and EMC claims are subject to the above requirements.

Interest must be paid on claims that are not paid within the ceiling period. 

The count starts on the day after the receipt date and it ends on the date payment is made. For example, for clean claims received October 1, 1993, and later, if this span is 30 days or less, the requirement is met.

RAPs submitted by home health agencies under the HH PPS (records with type of bill 322 or 332 and dates of service on or after October 1, 2000) are not Medicare claims as defined under the Social Security Act. Since they are not considered claims, they (records with type of bill 322 or 332 and dates of service on or after October 1, 2000) are not subjected to payment ceiling standards and interest payment.

For purposes of the payment floors and ceilings, for Medicare purposes:

An “electronic claim” is one that is submitted via central processing unit (CPU) to CPU transmission, tape, diskette, direct data entry, direct wire, or personal computer upload or download. Claims submitted via digital FAX/OCR, diskette or touch-tone phone are not counted or paid as EMC. See 80.2.1.2 for differentiation between electronic claims that comply with the requirements of the standard implementation guides adopted for national use under HIPAA and those submitted electronically using pre-HIPAA formats supported by Medicare. This HIPAA format differentiation applies to the payment floor, but not to the ceiling.


A “paper claim” is submitted and received on paper, including fax print-outs. This also includes claims the carrier or FI received on paper and read electronically with OCR technology. 



Popular Posts